Do the arithmetic yourself.
Three calculators I use in my own work, made public. Change the numbers, watch the curve move, take the data away as a spreadsheet. Everything runs in your browser, nothing is uploaded, and each model names the paper it comes from.
Shock-melt vein cooling
A vein of half-width a, molten at Tm, quenching into host rock at Th. Whether a high-pressure phase survives comes down to this curve: nucleation and growth need time above a threshold, and a thin vein does not give it to them.
Result
Exact solution for a slab initial condition in an infinite medium: T(x,t) = Th + ½(Tm−Th)[erf((a−x)/2√(αt)) + erf((a+x)/2√(αt))], α = k/ρcp. Carslaw & Jaeger (1959), Conduction of Heat in Solids, §2.3.
Peak shock pressure
Planar impact approximation with a linear shock–particle Hugoniot, Us = C0 + S·up, solved by impedance match so the impactor and target need not be the same material. The pressure is then mapped onto the Stöffler shock stages.
Result
Melosh (1989), Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process, ch. 4. Shock-stage boundaries for ordinary chondrites after Stöffler, Keil & Scott (1991) and Stöffler, Hamann & Metzler (2018). Hugoniot constants are room-temperature literature values; they shift with porosity and pre-heating.
Crater scaling
How big a hole a given impactor makes, in the gravity regime, in competent rock. The Lonar preset reproduces the real crater's 1.88 km in Deccan basalt for a plausible impactor, which is the most you should ask of a scaling law.
Result
Dtc = 1.161 (ρi/ρt)1/3 L0.78 v0.44 g−0.22 (sin θ)1/3 Simple craters finalise near 1.25 Dtc; above the ~3.2 km simple-to-complex transition on Earth they collapse wider. Schmidt & Housen (1987); Melosh (1989) §7.8.
What these will and won't tell you
Every one of these is a first-order estimate. Treat them as a way to check whether a number is plausible, not as a substitute for a model.
Vein cooling
Assumes constant thermal properties, no latent heat of crystallisation, and a host that is infinite and initially uniform. Latent heat holds the vein hotter for longer than this curve shows, so quench times here are lower bounds.
Shock pressure
The planar impact approximation holds only near the impact point, in the first moments. It ignores porosity, which raises shock heating sharply, and pre-shock temperature. Real peak pressures decay steeply away from the contact.
Crater scaling
Gravity-regime scaling for competent rock. It is wrong in the strength regime (small craters, strong targets), wrong for very oblique impacts below about 15°, and does not model atmospheric break-up of the impactor.